<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 210 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766825</link>
    <description>ITAT Chandigarh allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding addition under Section 69B read with Section 115BBE. The assessee surrendered additional stock discovered during survey operations. The tribunal held that since the excess stock was regular trading stock without physical distinction from accounted inventory, it constituted business receipts rather than undisclosed investment. The difference represented value variation only, not independent undisclosed assets. Therefore, Section 69B&#039;s deeming provisions were inapplicable, and the surrendered amount should be taxed as business income at normal rates rather than under Section 115BBE&#039;s penal taxation provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 07:49:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=803862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 210 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766825</link>
      <description>ITAT Chandigarh allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding addition under Section 69B read with Section 115BBE. The assessee surrendered additional stock discovered during survey operations. The tribunal held that since the excess stock was regular trading stock without physical distinction from accounted inventory, it constituted business receipts rather than undisclosed investment. The difference represented value variation only, not independent undisclosed assets. Therefore, Section 69B&#039;s deeming provisions were inapplicable, and the surrendered amount should be taxed as business income at normal rates rather than under Section 115BBE&#039;s penal taxation provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>