<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 212 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766827</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271E could not be sustained where the assessment order did not record the Assessing Officer&#039;s satisfaction that repayment of cash attracted section 269T and warranted initiation of penalty proceedings. The record showed initiation of other penalty action, but no recorded satisfaction connecting the alleged default to section 269T or the proposed penalty under section 271E. In the absence of that foundational satisfaction in the assessment proceedings, the penalty proceedings were held to lack a valid basis, and the penalty order and the appellate order upholding it were set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 07:49:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=803860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 212 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766827</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271E could not be sustained where the assessment order did not record the Assessing Officer&#039;s satisfaction that repayment of cash attracted section 269T and warranted initiation of penalty proceedings. The record showed initiation of other penalty action, but no recorded satisfaction connecting the alleged default to section 269T or the proposed penalty under section 271E. In the absence of that foundational satisfaction in the assessment proceedings, the penalty proceedings were held to lack a valid basis, and the penalty order and the appellate order upholding it were set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>