<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 219 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766834</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the disallowance of the deduction under section 80JJAA was invalid. It was determined that the disallowance by the CPC exceeded the jurisdiction of section 143(1) and that the issue was too complex to be addressed under section 154, which is limited to rectifying apparent mistakes. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the disallowance and upheld the assessee&#039;s eligibility for the deduction, ruling in their favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 07:49:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=803853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 219 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766834</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the disallowance of the deduction under section 80JJAA was invalid. It was determined that the disallowance by the CPC exceeded the jurisdiction of section 143(1) and that the issue was too complex to be addressed under section 154, which is limited to rectifying apparent mistakes. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the disallowance and upheld the assessee&#039;s eligibility for the deduction, ruling in their favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>