https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766859 The court set aside the impugned order dated 22.04.2024, finding that the respondent violated principles of natural justice by not providing the petitioner a genuine opportunity for a personal hearing. The court criticized the respondent's procedural shortcomings, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to Section 75(4) of the GST Act, 2017, which mandates a fair hearing before adverse decisions. The case was remanded for fresh consideration, underscoring the importance of procedural fairness and the right to be heard in administrative proceedings. en-us Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Mar 2025 07:49:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766859 The court set aside the impugned order dated 22.04.2024, finding that the respondent violated principles of natural justice by not providing the petitioner a genuine opportunity for a personal hearing. The court criticized the respondent's procedural shortcomings, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to Section 75(4) of the GST Act, 2017, which mandates a fair hearing before adverse decisions. The case was remanded for fresh consideration, underscoring the importance of procedural fairness and the right to be heard in administrative proceedings. Case-Laws GST Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766859