https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=36125 The court distinguished civil debts under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code from regulatory penalties under consumer protection law, concluding that such penalties do not constitute debt for purposes of the IBC moratorium; therefore, execution proceedings enforcing consumer forum orders imposing regulatory penalties are not covered by the interim moratorium. en-us Tue, 04 Mar 2025 21:16:03 +0530 Tue, 04 Mar 2025 21:16:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=36125 The court distinguished civil debts under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code from regulatory penalties under consumer protection law, concluding that such penalties do not constitute debt for purposes of the IBC moratorium; therefore, execution proceedings enforcing consumer forum orders imposing regulatory penalties are not covered by the interim moratorium. News - Tue, 04 Mar 2025 21:16:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=36125