https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41847 The petitioners successfully challenged the rejection of their refund claim as time-barred, citing legal precedents supporting their case. The court rejected the Department's argument on unjust enrichment, emphasizing consistent Supreme Court rulings against it. The petitioners' claim was upheld, and the matter was remitted for the determination of the refund amount within three months. The judge ruled in favor of the petitioners, highlighting legal precedence and dismissing the Department's contentions. en-us Fri, 21 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:16:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41847 The petitioners successfully challenged the rejection of their refund claim as time-barred, citing legal precedents supporting their case. The court rejected the Department's argument on unjust enrichment, emphasizing consistent Supreme Court rulings against it. The petitioners' claim was upheld, and the matter was remitted for the determination of the refund amount within three months. The judge ruled in favor of the petitioners, highlighting legal precedence and dismissing the Department's contentions. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 21 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41847