<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 2167 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460955</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad upheld partial disallowance under Section 14A r.w. Rule 8D for administrative expenses related to exempt income, as assessee failed to maintain separate accounts and substantiate allocation basis, while deleting interest disallowance due to sufficient interest-free funds. The tribunal allowed product registration expenses as revenue expenditure since registration was mandatory for overseas sales. Stock valuation differences were accepted as legitimate accounting standard variations. Section 80IC deduction for Baddi unit was allowed on entire business profits, rejecting artificial segregation into manufacturing, marketing, and brand components.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 09:11:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=803756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 2167 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460955</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad upheld partial disallowance under Section 14A r.w. Rule 8D for administrative expenses related to exempt income, as assessee failed to maintain separate accounts and substantiate allocation basis, while deleting interest disallowance due to sufficient interest-free funds. The tribunal allowed product registration expenses as revenue expenditure since registration was mandatory for overseas sales. Stock valuation differences were accepted as legitimate accounting standard variations. Section 80IC deduction for Baddi unit was allowed on entire business profits, rejecting artificial segregation into manufacturing, marketing, and brand components.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>