<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1532 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460961</link>
    <description>Interest expenditure is deductible under section 57(iii) where borrowed funds are directly deployed to earn interest income, because the outlay is then laid out wholly and exclusively for income chargeable under the head &quot;Income from other sources&quot;. The Delhi High Court accepted the Tribunal&#039;s finding of a direct nexus between the borrowing cost and the interest earned, and held that the facts were materially different from Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals, which involved pre-production borrowings for setting up factories. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s allowance of the claim was upheld and the disallowance was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 18:58:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=803750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1532 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460961</link>
      <description>Interest expenditure is deductible under section 57(iii) where borrowed funds are directly deployed to earn interest income, because the outlay is then laid out wholly and exclusively for income chargeable under the head &quot;Income from other sources&quot;. The Delhi High Court accepted the Tribunal&#039;s finding of a direct nexus between the borrowing cost and the interest earned, and held that the facts were materially different from Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals, which involved pre-production borrowings for setting up factories. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s allowance of the claim was upheld and the disallowance was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>