<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (11) TMI 47 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41832</link>
    <description>Base dyes purchased in the open market may ordinarily be presumed to be duty-paid where the excise regime prohibits removal from the factory without payment of duty. The petitioners retained the burden of showing compliance with Notification No. 180/61-C.E., but that burden was satisfied by invoices and dealer certificates consistent with the applicable trade notice. Exemption could not be denied merely because gate passes or direct proof of actual duty payment were unavailable when the surrounding documents supported compliance. On that footing, the demand and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:22:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (11) TMI 47 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41832</link>
      <description>Base dyes purchased in the open market may ordinarily be presumed to be duty-paid where the excise regime prohibits removal from the factory without payment of duty. The petitioners retained the burden of showing compliance with Notification No. 180/61-C.E., but that burden was satisfied by invoices and dealer certificates consistent with the applicable trade notice. Exemption could not be denied merely because gate passes or direct proof of actual duty payment were unavailable when the surrounding documents supported compliance. On that footing, the demand and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>