<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 36 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41825</link>
    <description>Processing grey cotton and man-made fabrics on a job work basis was treated as manufacture for excise purposes on the footing that an earlier three-Judge decision had already so held, and that a two-Judge Bench could not depart from that view. For valuation, the assessable value was taken to arise at the factory gate when the processed goods leave the processor&#039;s factory; it includes the grey fabric and job work charges, but not the trader&#039;s subsequent selling profit, because post-factory profit is extraneous to the processor&#039;s assessable value. The matters were referred to a five-Judge Bench for reconsideration of valuation and, if necessary, manufacture.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 18:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 36 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41825</link>
      <description>Processing grey cotton and man-made fabrics on a job work basis was treated as manufacture for excise purposes on the footing that an earlier three-Judge decision had already so held, and that a two-Judge Bench could not depart from that view. For valuation, the assessable value was taken to arise at the factory gate when the processed goods leave the processor&#039;s factory; it includes the grey fabric and job work charges, but not the trader&#039;s subsequent selling profit, because post-factory profit is extraneous to the processor&#039;s assessable value. The matters were referred to a five-Judge Bench for reconsideration of valuation and, if necessary, manufacture.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>