https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86222 HC directed respondents to extend industrial promotion policy benefits to petitioner within 3 months. While respondents acknowledged petitioner's construction investment per appellate authority's order dated 05/01/2022, they denied benefits under Clauses 9(a) and 9(b) of 22/06/2018 policy, citing ineligibility under 2014 policy. Court noted that post-GST implementation, State issued circular dated 22/06/2018 modifying previous policy. Finding respondents' denial unjustified, HC mandated compliance with appellate authority's order, requiring extension of benefits as per modified policy provisions. en-us Tue, 04 Mar 2025 07:12:48 +0530 Tue, 04 Mar 2025 07:12:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86222 HC directed respondents to extend industrial promotion policy benefits to petitioner within 3 months. While respondents acknowledged petitioner's construction investment per appellate authority's order dated 05/01/2022, they denied benefits under Clauses 9(a) and 9(b) of 22/06/2018 policy, citing ineligibility under 2014 policy. Court noted that post-GST implementation, State issued circular dated 22/06/2018 modifying previous policy. Finding respondents' denial unjustified, HC mandated compliance with appellate authority's order, requiring extension of benefits as per modified policy provisions. Highlights GST Tue, 04 Mar 2025 07:12:48 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86222