<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supply of Veterinary Unit Staff on Contract Basis Not Exempt from GST as Healthcare Service Under 12/2017-CT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86217</link>
    <description>AAR ruled that supply of Mobile Veterinary Unit (MVU) personnel on contractual basis for implementing veterinary healthcare schemes does not qualify for GST exemption under N/N. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate). The authority distinguished between direct veterinary services and manpower supply, noting that the applicant merely provides contractual staff to the implementing agency rather than operating as a veterinary clinic. The ruling established that two separate supplies occur: first between applicant and implementing agency, then between agency and government department. Since the applicant&#039;s service constitutes manpower supply rather than direct veterinary healthcare, it falls outside the scope of exemptions under notification entries 3, 3A, 5, 6, and 46.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 07:12:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 07:12:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=803530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supply of Veterinary Unit Staff on Contract Basis Not Exempt from GST as Healthcare Service Under 12/2017-CT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86217</link>
      <description>AAR ruled that supply of Mobile Veterinary Unit (MVU) personnel on contractual basis for implementing veterinary healthcare schemes does not qualify for GST exemption under N/N. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate). The authority distinguished between direct veterinary services and manpower supply, noting that the applicant merely provides contractual staff to the implementing agency rather than operating as a veterinary clinic. The ruling established that two separate supplies occur: first between applicant and implementing agency, then between agency and government department. Since the applicant&#039;s service constitutes manpower supply rather than direct veterinary healthcare, it falls outside the scope of exemptions under notification entries 3, 3A, 5, 6, and 46.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 07:12:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>