https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766730 The SC held that the NCDRC erred in calculating the limitation period under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. While the initial cause of action arose in July 2015 after a six-month period expired, the appellants' complaint sought security of title for flats already in their possession, not the original flats in escrow. The Court found the complaint was filed within the limitation period as it concerned a subsequent situation where appellants sought registration in their name and protection from third-party alienation. The impugned order was set aside and appeal disposed of. en-us Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Mar 2025 07:12:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766730 The SC held that the NCDRC erred in calculating the limitation period under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. While the initial cause of action arose in July 2015 after a six-month period expired, the appellants' complaint sought security of title for flats already in their possession, not the original flats in escrow. The Court found the complaint was filed within the limitation period as it concerned a subsequent situation where appellants sought registration in their name and protection from third-party alienation. The impugned order was set aside and appeal disposed of. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766730