<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 124 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766739</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax on full consideration received for Manpower Supply Service including salary, PF and ESIC. Following SC precedent in Intercontinental Consultants case, the tribunal ruled that demand under Section 67 of the Act for April-July 2012 period was unsustainable as it improperly included reimbursable expenses. The Rajasthan HC had previously decided the same issue in appellant&#039;s favor. The impugned order was set aside for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 07:12:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=803497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 124 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766739</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax on full consideration received for Manpower Supply Service including salary, PF and ESIC. Following SC precedent in Intercontinental Consultants case, the tribunal ruled that demand under Section 67 of the Act for April-July 2012 period was unsustainable as it improperly included reimbursable expenses. The Rajasthan HC had previously decided the same issue in appellant&#039;s favor. The impugned order was set aside for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>