https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766788 Notifications extending limitation under Section 168A of the CGST Act were challenged on the ground that they may not have been issued in compliance with the requirement of GST Council recommendation; the Court found arguable issues on that point and noted that similar questions were already pending before the Supreme Court. The Court also held that there was a strong prima facie case for interim protection because the challenge to the impugned order depended on the validity of the extension notifications, and it granted restraint against further steps under that order pending final disposal of the petition. en-us Wed, 26 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Mar 2025 11:43:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766788 Notifications extending limitation under Section 168A of the CGST Act were challenged on the ground that they may not have been issued in compliance with the requirement of GST Council recommendation; the Court found arguable issues on that point and noted that similar questions were already pending before the Supreme Court. The Court also held that there was a strong prima facie case for interim protection because the challenge to the impugned order depended on the validity of the extension notifications, and it granted restraint against further steps under that order pending final disposal of the petition. Case-Laws GST Wed, 26 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766788