https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766790 The challenge concerned notifications extending the limitation period under Section 168A of the CGST Act and whether they were prima facie invalid for want of a GST Council recommendation. The Court noted arguable issues on the validity of the later extension notifications, and observed that the challenge to the assessment order under Section 73(9) depended on that validity. Finding a strong prima facie case and noting a similar interim order in another matter, the Court granted protective interim relief restraining further action under the impugned order, with liberty to seek appropriate relief depending on the Supreme Court outcome. en-us Wed, 26 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jun 2025 21:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766790 The challenge concerned notifications extending the limitation period under Section 168A of the CGST Act and whether they were prima facie invalid for want of a GST Council recommendation. The Court noted arguable issues on the validity of the later extension notifications, and observed that the challenge to the assessment order under Section 73(9) depended on that validity. Finding a strong prima facie case and noting a similar interim order in another matter, the Court granted protective interim relief restraining further action under the impugned order, with liberty to seek appropriate relief depending on the Supreme Court outcome. Case-Laws GST Wed, 26 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766790