https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766791 Notifications issued under Section 168A extending CGST time limits were challenged as lacking recommendation of the GST Council, and the Court treated the legality of those extension notifications as an arguable issue. It also noted that similar questions were pending before the Supreme Court. On interim protection, the Court found a strong prima facie case because the validity of the notifications directly affected whether the impugned Section 73(9) order could be acted upon. Rule was issued and interim relief was granted restraining further action pursuant to the order. en-us Wed, 26 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jun 2025 21:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766791 Notifications issued under Section 168A extending CGST time limits were challenged as lacking recommendation of the GST Council, and the Court treated the legality of those extension notifications as an arguable issue. It also noted that similar questions were pending before the Supreme Court. On interim protection, the Court found a strong prima facie case because the validity of the notifications directly affected whether the impugned Section 73(9) order could be acted upon. Rule was issued and interim relief was granted restraining further action pursuant to the order. Case-Laws GST Wed, 26 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766791