<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (6) TMI 34 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41814</link>
    <description>The court upheld the respondent&#039;s classification of the imported staples under Heading 73.31 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, dismissing the writ appeal. It found the Customs Authorities&#039; classification under Heading 83.01/15(2) unreasonable and lacking detailed rationale. The court also granted oral leave to the Supreme Court sought by the appellants&#039; counsel.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 17:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (6) TMI 34 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41814</link>
      <description>The court upheld the respondent&#039;s classification of the imported staples under Heading 73.31 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, dismissing the writ appeal. It found the Customs Authorities&#039; classification under Heading 83.01/15(2) unreasonable and lacking detailed rationale. The court also granted oral leave to the Supreme Court sought by the appellants&#039; counsel.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>