https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460929 Directors receiving remuneration for duties entrusted by the company may fall within the ESI Act's definition of "employee" where they are paid from wages in connection with the establishment's work. The Court applied the broad definitions of "employee" and "wages" under Sections 2(9) and 2(22), and treated remuneration for assigned duties as contribution-bearing where the company produced no evidence to rebut the Corporation's finding. The employer's challenge failed, and the contribution demand was maintained as operative. en-us Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Mar 2025 18:59:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460929 Directors receiving remuneration for duties entrusted by the company may fall within the ESI Act's definition of "employee" where they are paid from wages in connection with the establishment's work. The Court applied the broad definitions of "employee" and "wages" under Sections 2(9) and 2(22), and treated remuneration for assigned duties as contribution-bearing where the company produced no evidence to rebut the Corporation's finding. The employer's challenge failed, and the contribution demand was maintained as operative. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460929