<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1537 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460943</link>
    <description>Cancellation of GST registration was not restored because the petitioner did not seek revocation or file an appeal within the statutory limitation period, and the court found no basis to exercise writ jurisdiction in favour of a party that had remained indolent for about one year. The writ petition was dismissed, with liberty to the petitioner to apply for fresh registration before the competent authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 18:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=803380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1537 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460943</link>
      <description>Cancellation of GST registration was not restored because the petitioner did not seek revocation or file an appeal within the statutory limitation period, and the court found no basis to exercise writ jurisdiction in favour of a party that had remained indolent for about one year. The writ petition was dismissed, with liberty to the petitioner to apply for fresh registration before the competent authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>