<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (3) TMI 85 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41807</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the validity of Tamil Nadu Act 1 of 1979, allowing for the collection of Central Excise Surcharge on electricity supply. The retrospective applicability of the Act was deemed valid, with the Court emphasizing the Legislature&#039;s power to enact laws retrospectively. The Court found that the Act provided guidelines for tariff fixation, considering the cost of production. Additionally, the Court determined that the one paise additional charge per unit was justified to cover expenses incurred by the Electricity Board. The petitioners&#039; arguments challenging the Act&#039;s validity under various constitutional provisions were dismissed, and all writ petitions were rejected with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 11:58:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (3) TMI 85 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41807</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the validity of Tamil Nadu Act 1 of 1979, allowing for the collection of Central Excise Surcharge on electricity supply. The retrospective applicability of the Act was deemed valid, with the Court emphasizing the Legislature&#039;s power to enact laws retrospectively. The Court found that the Act provided guidelines for tariff fixation, considering the cost of production. Additionally, the Court determined that the one paise additional charge per unit was justified to cover expenses incurred by the Electricity Board. The petitioners&#039; arguments challenging the Act&#039;s validity under various constitutional provisions were dismissed, and all writ petitions were rejected with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>