<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (10) TMI 39 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41798</link>
    <description>Interim protection may be granted where a stay petition in a pending central excise appeal remains undecided, and prompt disposal of that application can be directed to prevent prejudice. The Madras High Court directed the appellate authority to decide the stay petition within three weeks and kept the adjudicating authority&#039;s order in abeyance until then.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 11:20:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (10) TMI 39 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41798</link>
      <description>Interim protection may be granted where a stay petition in a pending central excise appeal remains undecided, and prompt disposal of that application can be directed to prevent prejudice. The Madras High Court directed the appellate authority to decide the stay petition within three weeks and kept the adjudicating authority&#039;s order in abeyance until then.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>