https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41796 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the trade practice of provisional assessment pending analysis availability. It criticized the respondents for not considering this practice and the presence of iron ore fines in the exported goods. The court quashed the orders rejecting the refund and mandated the respondents to refund the excess duty amount due within four months, given the delay in processing the refund applications. No costs were awarded in this judgment. en-us Wed, 20 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Jun 2010 11:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41796 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the trade practice of provisional assessment pending analysis availability. It criticized the respondents for not considering this practice and the presence of iron ore fines in the exported goods. The court quashed the orders rejecting the refund and mandated the respondents to refund the excess duty amount due within four months, given the delay in processing the refund applications. No costs were awarded in this judgment. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 20 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41796