<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reassessment Under Section 147/148 Invalidated Due to Mechanical Approval and Lack of Actual Land Transfer Evidence</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86169</link>
    <description>ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to procedural defects in approval under s.147/148. The mandatory prior approval for reopening was found mechanical and lacked proper application of mind, being granted without adequate review of reasons to believe. Regarding sale consideration addition, CIT(A)&#039;s finding that land transfer did not occur during relevant assessment year within meaning of s.2(47) was upheld, as AO failed to demonstrate actual transfer. ITAT found no merit in revenue&#039;s contentions on both grounds - procedural invalidity of reopening and timing of land transfer. Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed, nullifying reassessment and associated additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 08:22:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 08:22:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=803116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reassessment Under Section 147/148 Invalidated Due to Mechanical Approval and Lack of Actual Land Transfer Evidence</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86169</link>
      <description>ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to procedural defects in approval under s.147/148. The mandatory prior approval for reopening was found mechanical and lacked proper application of mind, being granted without adequate review of reasons to believe. Regarding sale consideration addition, CIT(A)&#039;s finding that land transfer did not occur during relevant assessment year within meaning of s.2(47) was upheld, as AO failed to demonstrate actual transfer. ITAT found no merit in revenue&#039;s contentions on both grounds - procedural invalidity of reopening and timing of land transfer. Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed, nullifying reassessment and associated additions.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 08:22:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>