<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 93 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766708</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty order against the Assessee under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found the penalty order was barred by limitation, as it was issued on 1st April 2022, beyond the extended deadline of 31st March 2022 set by the CBDT notification. Consequently, the Tribunal did not address the substantive merits of the penalty&#039;s justification, focusing solely on the limitation issue under Section 275(1)(c).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 08:22:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=803076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 93 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766708</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty order against the Assessee under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found the penalty order was barred by limitation, as it was issued on 1st April 2022, beyond the extended deadline of 31st March 2022 set by the CBDT notification. Consequently, the Tribunal did not address the substantive merits of the penalty&#039;s justification, focusing solely on the limitation issue under Section 275(1)(c).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>