<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 96 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766711</link>
    <description>Gujarat HC allowed the petition challenging reopening of assessment. The court found that the AO had no valid reasons to initiate proceedings under Section 148A, as there were no unexplained cash deposits in petitioner&#039;s bank accounts and no information of escaped income. The petitioner&#039;s explanation and supporting documents demonstrated excess expenditure over income with no taxable income, making filing of return unnecessary. The reopening proceedings were deemed invalid and the petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 08:22:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=803073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 96 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766711</link>
      <description>Gujarat HC allowed the petition challenging reopening of assessment. The court found that the AO had no valid reasons to initiate proceedings under Section 148A, as there were no unexplained cash deposits in petitioner&#039;s bank accounts and no information of escaped income. The petitioner&#039;s explanation and supporting documents demonstrated excess expenditure over income with no taxable income, making filing of return unnecessary. The reopening proceedings were deemed invalid and the petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>