https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460916 A challenge was raised to the final assessment order under Section 73(9) of the CGST Act, along with the validity of notifications extending time under Section 168A and the objection that the impugned order was unsigned in breach of Rule 26 of the CGST Rules. The HC issued notice to the respondents and restrained coercive action against the petitioner in the meantime. en-us Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 May 2025 11:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460916 A challenge was raised to the final assessment order under Section 73(9) of the CGST Act, along with the validity of notifications extending time under Section 168A and the objection that the impugned order was unsigned in breach of Rule 26 of the CGST Rules. The HC issued notice to the respondents and restrained coercive action against the petitioner in the meantime. Case-Laws GST Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460916