<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (7) TMI 112 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41771</link>
    <description>The Court held that the distributors were not &quot;related persons&quot; under Section 4(4)(c) of the Central Excises &amp;amp; Salt Act, and the sales between the assessee and its distributors were at arm&#039;s length and on a principal-to-principal basis. The Collector&#039;s decision to impose excise duty on the distributors was overturned, and the petition was allowed with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 10:13:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (7) TMI 112 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41771</link>
      <description>The Court held that the distributors were not &quot;related persons&quot; under Section 4(4)(c) of the Central Excises &amp;amp; Salt Act, and the sales between the assessee and its distributors were at arm&#039;s length and on a principal-to-principal basis. The Collector&#039;s decision to impose excise duty on the distributors was overturned, and the petition was allowed with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>