<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Income Tax Reassessment Under Section 147 Invalidated Due To Vague Notice And Procedural Lapses In 148A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86151</link>
    <description>HC quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under s.147 due to procedural deficiencies and lack of specific information. AO failed to provide essential details including bank name in s.148A(b) notice, making it impossible for assessee to respond effectively. Despite assessee&#039;s objections and proof of closed ICICI account, AO proceeded hastily without proper verification. Department&#039;s failure to deny bank&#039;s confirmation of account closure and inability to establish prima facie connection between disputed account and assessee demonstrated non-compliance with s.148A procedural requirements. Court found reassessment notice invalid due to vague information, rushed decision-making, and department&#039;s failure to substantiate claims even during proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2025 08:25:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2025 08:25:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=802871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Income Tax Reassessment Under Section 147 Invalidated Due To Vague Notice And Procedural Lapses In 148A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86151</link>
      <description>HC quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under s.147 due to procedural deficiencies and lack of specific information. AO failed to provide essential details including bank name in s.148A(b) notice, making it impossible for assessee to respond effectively. Despite assessee&#039;s objections and proof of closed ICICI account, AO proceeded hastily without proper verification. Department&#039;s failure to deny bank&#039;s confirmation of account closure and inability to establish prima facie connection between disputed account and assessee demonstrated non-compliance with s.148A procedural requirements. Court found reassessment notice invalid due to vague information, rushed decision-making, and department&#039;s failure to substantiate claims even during proceedings.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2025 08:25:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>