https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41756 Article 22(5) requires supply of the basic facts and materials actually relied upon for preventive detention, but documents only casually referred to and not relied upon need not be furnished; a request by the detenu does not make such material mandatory. In preventive detention matters, reference to the Section 123 Customs Act presumption does not by itself invalidate the order where the grounds are read as a whole and the detention is supported by relevant material. The reasons for granting bail, and an assayer's certificate unrelated to the other detenu, were treated as immaterial to the subjective satisfaction underlying the detention orders. en-us Wed, 25 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Jun 2010 18:19:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41756 Article 22(5) requires supply of the basic facts and materials actually relied upon for preventive detention, but documents only casually referred to and not relied upon need not be furnished; a request by the detenu does not make such material mandatory. In preventive detention matters, reference to the Section 123 Customs Act presumption does not by itself invalidate the order where the grounds are read as a whole and the detention is supported by relevant material. The reasons for granting bail, and an assayer's certificate unrelated to the other detenu, were treated as immaterial to the subjective satisfaction underlying the detention orders. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 25 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41756