<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 5 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766620</link>
    <description>CESTAT Bangalore held that Rule 7 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 cannot be invoked for valuation of goods sold from depot during 2004-2012. Since 90% of sales occurred at factory gate to unrelated customers, the demand raised by invoking Rule 7 was unsustainable. The tribunal found that Rule 7 applies only when excisable goods are not sold at the time and place of removal. Appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2025 08:25:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=802843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 5 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766620</link>
      <description>CESTAT Bangalore held that Rule 7 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 cannot be invoked for valuation of goods sold from depot during 2004-2012. Since 90% of sales occurred at factory gate to unrelated customers, the demand raised by invoking Rule 7 was unsustainable. The tribunal found that Rule 7 applies only when excisable goods are not sold at the time and place of removal. Appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>