<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 28 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766643</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad allowed partial relief to the assessee in a case involving bogus subcontract expenses. The AO had estimated profit at 25% while CIT(A) sustained addition at 16%. Following precedent from assessee&#039;s own case for A.Y. 2009-10 where the Tribunal restricted disallowance to 12.5% of bogus purchases, the ITAT applied the same principle and limited the disallowance to 12.5% of the subcontract amount, granting partial relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2025 08:25:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=802820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 28 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766643</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad allowed partial relief to the assessee in a case involving bogus subcontract expenses. The AO had estimated profit at 25% while CIT(A) sustained addition at 16%. Following precedent from assessee&#039;s own case for A.Y. 2009-10 where the Tribunal restricted disallowance to 12.5% of bogus purchases, the ITAT applied the same principle and limited the disallowance to 12.5% of the subcontract amount, granting partial relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>