<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 31 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766646</link>
    <description>Section 56(2)(viib) was held inapplicable to share premium received by a wholly owned subsidiary from its 100% holding company because the transaction was confined within the group and no benefit accrued to an outside party. Relying on earlier co-ordinate bench rulings endorsed by the High Court, the Tribunal found the deletion of the addition consistent with the settled legal position, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2025 08:25:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=802817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 31 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766646</link>
      <description>Section 56(2)(viib) was held inapplicable to share premium received by a wholly owned subsidiary from its 100% holding company because the transaction was confined within the group and no benefit accrued to an outside party. Relying on earlier co-ordinate bench rulings endorsed by the High Court, the Tribunal found the deletion of the addition consistent with the settled legal position, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>