<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 33 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766648</link>
    <description>Interest expenditure on Government loans was held allowable where the assessee followed the mercantile system and had consistently accrued the liability in its books. The Revenue failed to show that the loan had ceased to bear interest, that the interest was waived, or that the advance had been converted into a grant-in-aid or non-interest-bearing loan. In the absence of material to disturb the settled accounting treatment followed in earlier years, the disallowance was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2025 08:25:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=802815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 33 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766648</link>
      <description>Interest expenditure on Government loans was held allowable where the assessee followed the mercantile system and had consistently accrued the liability in its books. The Revenue failed to show that the loan had ceased to bear interest, that the interest was waived, or that the advance had been converted into a grant-in-aid or non-interest-bearing loan. In the absence of material to disturb the settled accounting treatment followed in earlier years, the disallowance was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>