<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 51 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766666</link>
    <description>Denial of a personal hearing in draft assessment proceedings breached the principles of natural justice under the IT Act, rendering the final assessment order without jurisdiction and non est; consequence - the impugned assessment is quashed. Because the demand notice and penalty notices arose from that void assessment, those consequential notices cannot survive legal scrutiny and are invalid; consequence - related demand and penalty actions set aside. The court rejected respondent submissions about alternative appellate remedies and mere one day delay, emphasizing that foundational illegality cannot be cured by subsequent appeals and allowed the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=802797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 51 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766666</link>
      <description>Denial of a personal hearing in draft assessment proceedings breached the principles of natural justice under the IT Act, rendering the final assessment order without jurisdiction and non est; consequence - the impugned assessment is quashed. Because the demand notice and penalty notices arose from that void assessment, those consequential notices cannot survive legal scrutiny and are invalid; consequence - related demand and penalty actions set aside. The court rejected respondent submissions about alternative appellate remedies and mere one day delay, emphasizing that foundational illegality cannot be cured by subsequent appeals and allowed the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>