<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>DRC 07 issued without 3 Reminders</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119663</link>
    <description>Adjudication issued without granting repeated personal hearing opportunities may breach principles of natural justice; one view advises seeking rectification of the order as an apparent error to preserve pre-deposit obligations and appeal rights, while an alternative view stresses that adjournments arise only if sufficient cause is shown by the person charged, so the ability to challenge depends on proof of a requested adjournment and demonstration of prejudice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 15:22:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 17:00:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=802634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>DRC 07 issued without 3 Reminders</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119663</link>
      <description>Adjudication issued without granting repeated personal hearing opportunities may breach principles of natural justice; one view advises seeking rectification of the order as an apparent error to preserve pre-deposit obligations and appeal rights, while an alternative view stresses that adjournments arise only if sufficient cause is shown by the person charged, so the ability to challenge depends on proof of a requested adjournment and demonstration of prejudice.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 15:22:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>