<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 1145 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460896</link>
    <description>The HC of Patna admitted the case concerning a dispute over a lump sum turnover calculation leading to a substantial service tax demand. The petitioner, represented by counsel, sought time to present detailed calculations if found liable. The court adjourned the matter, scheduling it for 21st December 2010. The respondent&#039;s counsel assured that no coercive measures would be enacted against the petitioner until further court orders regarding interim arrangements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 15:40:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=802633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 1145 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460896</link>
      <description>The HC of Patna admitted the case concerning a dispute over a lump sum turnover calculation leading to a substantial service tax demand. The petitioner, represented by counsel, sought time to present detailed calculations if found liable. The court adjourned the matter, scheduling it for 21st December 2010. The respondent&#039;s counsel assured that no coercive measures would be enacted against the petitioner until further court orders regarding interim arrangements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>