<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (7) TMI 94 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41723</link>
    <description>For job-work manufacture, the value of clearances for exemption under Notification No. 105/80 was confined to labour or job-work charges, and the value of customer-supplied raw materials was not added for computing the exemption limit. Once the exemption threshold was exceeded, further clearances lost notification benefit and assessable value was required to be determined under the general valuation rule by including the value of raw materials supplied by customers. The petition was thus partly allowed on the exemption computation issue, while duty on excess clearances was payable on assessable value including supplied materials.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 16:17:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (7) TMI 94 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41723</link>
      <description>For job-work manufacture, the value of clearances for exemption under Notification No. 105/80 was confined to labour or job-work charges, and the value of customer-supplied raw materials was not added for computing the exemption limit. Once the exemption threshold was exceeded, further clearances lost notification benefit and assessable value was required to be determined under the general valuation rule by including the value of raw materials supplied by customers. The petition was thus partly allowed on the exemption computation issue, while duty on excess clearances was payable on assessable value including supplied materials.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>