https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766569 A dispute over pre-CIRP electricity dues linked to implementation of an approved resolution plan fell within NCLT jurisdiction under Section 60(5)(c) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code because it arose in relation to insolvency resolution. The Code also prevailed over the Electricity Act under Section 238, so the dues dispute was not confined to the Electricity Act alone. As no claim was filed by the electricity company during CIRP and the approved resolution plan made no provision for the arrears, the unresolved pre-CIRP dues could not be enforced against the Successful Resolution Applicant or treated as a condition for restoration of supply. en-us Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Feb 2025 08:23:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766569 A dispute over pre-CIRP electricity dues linked to implementation of an approved resolution plan fell within NCLT jurisdiction under Section 60(5)(c) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code because it arose in relation to insolvency resolution. The Code also prevailed over the Electricity Act under Section 238, so the dues dispute was not confined to the Electricity Act alone. As no claim was filed by the electricity company during CIRP and the approved resolution plan made no provision for the arrears, the unresolved pre-CIRP dues could not be enforced against the Successful Resolution Applicant or treated as a condition for restoration of supply. Case-Laws IBC Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766569