https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41719 Refund of excise duty became payable once the appellate order set aside the demand, and the mere filing of a further appeal with a stay application did not suspend that order. In the absence of an operative stay, the authorities could not withhold refund only because an appeal had been preferred. The petitioner was held entitled to refund of the excise duty amount, and payment was to be made within one month unless a stay order was obtained within that period. en-us Mon, 23 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Jun 2010 15:56:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41719 Refund of excise duty became payable once the appellate order set aside the demand, and the mere filing of a further appeal with a stay application did not suspend that order. In the absence of an operative stay, the authorities could not withhold refund only because an appeal had been preferred. The petitioner was held entitled to refund of the excise duty amount, and payment was to be made within one month unless a stay order was obtained within that period. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41719