https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766606 Interference with a show cause notice was declined because the court held that whether the notice travels beyond the existing advance ruling, and the correct tax liability and rate, are matters for adjudication by the authorities. The petitioner was directed to face the notice, file its reply or representation within four weeks, and the notice was to be adjudicated within twelve weeks. The ruling leaves the substantive dispute to be decided in the statutory process rather than at the notice stage. en-us Thu, 09 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Nov 2025 11:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766606 Interference with a show cause notice was declined because the court held that whether the notice travels beyond the existing advance ruling, and the correct tax liability and rate, are matters for adjudication by the authorities. The petitioner was directed to face the notice, file its reply or representation within four weeks, and the notice was to be adjudicated within twelve weeks. The ruling leaves the substantive dispute to be decided in the statutory process rather than at the notice stage. Case-Laws GST Thu, 09 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766606