<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1155 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766608</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction is not ordinarily invoked to examine disputed factual allegations underlying a show cause notice, including alleged misuse of credentials and identity theft, where resolution requires inquiry by the competent authority. The High Court declined to assess the merits of those contested claims in writ proceedings and left the investigation to the respondents. The petitioner was permitted to place material before the authorities for consideration while finalising the proceedings, and both sides&#039; rights and contentions on merits were kept open. The writ petition was disposed of without adjudication on the disputed facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 08:23:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=802455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1155 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766608</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction is not ordinarily invoked to examine disputed factual allegations underlying a show cause notice, including alleged misuse of credentials and identity theft, where resolution requires inquiry by the competent authority. The High Court declined to assess the merits of those contested claims in writ proceedings and left the investigation to the respondents. The petitioner was permitted to place material before the authorities for consideration while finalising the proceedings, and both sides&#039; rights and contentions on merits were kept open. The writ petition was disposed of without adjudication on the disputed facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>