<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1414 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460891</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding addition of accrued interest income. The AO incorrectly held that the assessee was following a prohibited hybrid accounting system under section 145. The tribunal found that the assessee consistently followed cash system for computing Income from Other Sources and mercantile system for books of accounts as required under Companies Act. This was not a hybrid system violation but proper compliance with respective statutory requirements. The addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 18:57:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=802402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1414 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460891</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding addition of accrued interest income. The AO incorrectly held that the assessee was following a prohibited hybrid accounting system under section 145. The tribunal found that the assessee consistently followed cash system for computing Income from Other Sources and mercantile system for books of accounts as required under Companies Act. This was not a hybrid system violation but proper compliance with respective statutory requirements. The addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>