<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Partners&#039; Trade Advances and Reimbursements Not Deemed Dividend Under Section 2(22)(e) as Transactions Show Regular Business Operations</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86076</link>
    <description>ITAT dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal against CIT(A)&#039;s order regarding deemed dividend addition under section 2(22)(e). The assessee, a converted LLP, maintained ledger accounts showing loan transactions with a company where partners held substantial interest. The transactions reflected regular business operations with trade advances taken and returned, along with expense reimbursements, forming a running account for mutual benefit. The AO&#039;s treatment of peak credit as deemed dividend was rejected as they failed to establish that payments were made for individual shareholder benefits. While CIT(A) ruled based on LLP&#039;s non-shareholder status, ITAT upheld the order considering the regular business nature of transactions predating LLP conversion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 08:14:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 08:14:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=802212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Partners&#039; Trade Advances and Reimbursements Not Deemed Dividend Under Section 2(22)(e) as Transactions Show Regular Business Operations</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86076</link>
      <description>ITAT dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal against CIT(A)&#039;s order regarding deemed dividend addition under section 2(22)(e). The assessee, a converted LLP, maintained ledger accounts showing loan transactions with a company where partners held substantial interest. The transactions reflected regular business operations with trade advances taken and returned, along with expense reimbursements, forming a running account for mutual benefit. The AO&#039;s treatment of peak credit as deemed dividend was rejected as they failed to establish that payments were made for individual shareholder benefits. While CIT(A) ruled based on LLP&#039;s non-shareholder status, ITAT upheld the order considering the regular business nature of transactions predating LLP conversion.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 08:14:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>