<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1064 - SC Order (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766517</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appeal, affirming the CESTAT&#039;s factual finding that the product&#039;s fat content was below 55%. The delay in filing was condoned, and all pending applications were disposed of. The judgment was upheld as no error was identified in the impugned decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 08:14:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=802182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1064 - SC Order (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766517</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appeal, affirming the CESTAT&#039;s factual finding that the product&#039;s fat content was below 55%. The delay in filing was condoned, and all pending applications were disposed of. The judgment was upheld as no error was identified in the impugned decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>