<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1065 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766518</link>
    <description>The SC disposed of the appeal due to its low tax effect, without addressing the legal question. The court condoned the delay and disposed of any pending applications. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s counsel&#039;s request regarding the appeal&#039;s minimal tax impact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 08:14:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=802181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1065 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766518</link>
      <description>The SC disposed of the appeal due to its low tax effect, without addressing the legal question. The court condoned the delay and disposed of any pending applications. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s counsel&#039;s request regarding the appeal&#039;s minimal tax impact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>