<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 72 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41676</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, finding that power was not used for manufacturing metal containers during the disputed period. The Court emphasized the need for evidence to determine eligibility for duty exemption, overturning the orders of the Tribunal and the Collector without imposing costs on either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 08:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 72 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41676</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, finding that power was not used for manufacturing metal containers during the disputed period. The Court emphasized the need for evidence to determine eligibility for duty exemption, overturning the orders of the Tribunal and the Collector without imposing costs on either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>