https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41674 An appeal by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise seeking enhancement of sentence under Section 377(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was held not competent because a controlling Bench decision had already ruled that such an appeal through counsel on the ground of inadequacy of sentence was not maintainable. Applying that binding view, the court concluded that the appellant lacked competence to maintain the appeals, and they were therefore liable to be dismissed. en-us Thu, 21 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:28:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41674 An appeal by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise seeking enhancement of sentence under Section 377(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was held not competent because a controlling Bench decision had already ruled that such an appeal through counsel on the ground of inadequacy of sentence was not maintainable. Applying that binding view, the court concluded that the appellant lacked competence to maintain the appeals, and they were therefore liable to be dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 21 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41674