<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Personal Guarantor&#039;s Appeal Against Insolvency Process Under IBC Section 95 Fails as Creditor Rights Upheld Through Assignment</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86038</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging initiation of Personal Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 95 of IBC. Court affirmed creditor&#039;s right to file application despite alleged lack of privity, holding assignment agreement and transfer of rights were binding. Personal guarantee terms established independent rights of creditors alongside Trust. Appellant&#039;s liability as guarantor was confirmed as co-extensive with principal debtor per Section 128 of Contract Act. NCLAT validated Resolution Professional&#039;s appointment, Board Resolution&#039;s authority, and Adjudicating Authority&#039;s adherence to natural justice principles. Court emphasized creditor need not first proceed against principal borrower before pursuing guarantor, citing established precedent on surety&#039;s concurrent liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:17:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:17:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=801967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Personal Guarantor&#039;s Appeal Against Insolvency Process Under IBC Section 95 Fails as Creditor Rights Upheld Through Assignment</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86038</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging initiation of Personal Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 95 of IBC. Court affirmed creditor&#039;s right to file application despite alleged lack of privity, holding assignment agreement and transfer of rights were binding. Personal guarantee terms established independent rights of creditors alongside Trust. Appellant&#039;s liability as guarantor was confirmed as co-extensive with principal debtor per Section 128 of Contract Act. NCLAT validated Resolution Professional&#039;s appointment, Board Resolution&#039;s authority, and Adjudicating Authority&#039;s adherence to natural justice principles. Court emphasized creditor need not first proceed against principal borrower before pursuing guarantor, citing established precedent on surety&#039;s concurrent liability.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:17:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>