https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766472 Delhi HC granted regular bail to applicant in money laundering case after 3 years 4 months custody. Court noted scheduled offence trial hadn't commenced, charges not framed, and evidence primarily consisted of co-accused statements requiring trial verification. Relying on SC precedent in V. Senthil Balaji, HC held PMLA trial cannot conclude until scheduled offence trial ends. Given prolonged detention without foreseeable trial completion, continued incarceration violated Article 21 rights to liberty and speedy trial. Court found no material evidence of flight risk beyond prosecution's apprehension. Bail granted with personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and surety conditions. en-us Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:17:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766472 Delhi HC granted regular bail to applicant in money laundering case after 3 years 4 months custody. Court noted scheduled offence trial hadn't commenced, charges not framed, and evidence primarily consisted of co-accused statements requiring trial verification. Relying on SC precedent in V. Senthil Balaji, HC held PMLA trial cannot conclude until scheduled offence trial ends. Given prolonged detention without foreseeable trial completion, continued incarceration violated Article 21 rights to liberty and speedy trial. Court found no material evidence of flight risk beyond prosecution's apprehension. Bail granted with personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and surety conditions. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766472